 |
This is a reply only forum. If you wish to start a new topic please post it in the MacGyver Reboot forum.
|
|
 |
 |
Joe SAKic |
Posted: 23 September 2016 - 05:19 PM
|

Phoenix Operative
     
Posts: 1,483
Joined: 13 Feb 2013
Gender: Male
Country: Canada
SAK owned: Huntsman 85-91
Favorites
Season: ---
Episode:
Vehicle: ---
Jacket: ---
House: ---

|
Watched it, really liked it, would watch it again! Really upset that they broke code and are seen having a cold beer together at the end of a very emotional & dangerous assignment.  Just kidding  Did anybody catch the name of that brew? .... River!?, I think. And Nikki's a ratfink .... or so it appears ... still a bit of wiggle room there, methinks! And Jack is not an ass this time .... thankgawd!!!!!! And Billy Colton is back as 'Wilt', Mac's roomie, or so it appears to these eyes ... I strained my eyes and could not see a strand of hockey equipment within Mac's closet(s).  blasphemy!!  The episode was well written, the score/soundtrack complimentary & solid. I'd give it an 8/10 or 4 stars. My worst fears came true though, the computer graphics made some of the effects look amateurish ... especially noticeable in the truck explosion/shrapnel near the end.

The difference between the impossible and the possible lies in a man's determination.
Whether you think you can or you can't .... you're probably right!
"Nature often addressed our problems much better than the doctor." - Henry Miller
"So shut up, live, travel, adventure, bless and don't be sorry." - Jack Kerouac
"No one is remembered for being normal" -- Albert Einstein
|
|
|
Miasma |
Posted: 23 September 2016 - 06:16 PM
|

Phoenix Operative
     
Posts: 1,043
Joined: 8 Oct 2008
Gender:
Country:
SAK owned:
Favorites
Season:
Episode:
Vehicle:
Jacket:
House:

|
I thought it was quite good. Better than I expected after reading all the negative reviews.
Some pros and cons:
PROS:
1. I accepted Lucas Till as MacGyver much more quickly than I thought I would. And he's not the annoyingly smug guy we saw in the trailers, thankfully!
2. Some genuinely fun action scenes.
3. Plenty of MacGyverisms.
4. I'm intrigued to see where the Nikki plot goes. I like the fact that there's a bigger story here, not just the case-of-the-week stories.
5. It wasn't preachy! This felt more like the fun version of MacGyver, not the PSA MacGyver.
CONS:
1. I could really do without the gimmicky visuals when he's doing MacGyverisms. We don't need "PAPERCLIP" written on the screen, for example.
2. I don't hate Jack Dalton, but he is very one-dimensional at the moment. Maybe he'll develop as the show goes on... I hope.
3. Opening credits are a bit weak (nitpicking, I know.)
That's about it really. Overall, I'm pleasantly surprised. This is off to a good start, for sure. Is it brilliant television? No, of course not. Neither was the original. But it's an entertaining way to pass an hour. I'm looking forward to next week, since we already saw quite a bit of this week's episode in the preview clips. Next week will really be a new episode.
|
|
|
DXS |
Posted: 23 September 2016 - 06:40 PM
|

Special Forces Agent
  
Posts: 121
Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Gender: Female
Country: USA
SAK owned: Vitorinox
Favorites
Season: season 5
Episode:Legend of the Holy Rose
Vehicle: Jeep
Jacket: ---
House: House boat

|
I'm trying to like it...... was disappointed at the "beer" at the end, as the MacGyver we knew didn't drink.
But then again, in the original MacGyver, he shot a gun in the Pilot, then that got blown off, so to speak.
I thought it was cool how they named the ingredients in the MacGyvwerisms, which, to me, weren't that spectacular.
And him starting off with a girlfriend that turns into a ratfink.
And they actually described how they are going to get from DXS to Phenix. Which they didn't really do in the original, it was just switched with no story.
Speaking of Phoenix/Phenix....... I watched an original MacGyver, it was Gold Rush. They were using Snowcats with PHENIX spelled that way.
So, how is Phoenix/Phenix supposed to be spelled?
I'm trying to like it......
|
|
|
Miasma |
Posted: 23 September 2016 - 07:01 PM
|

Phoenix Operative
     
Posts: 1,043
Joined: 8 Oct 2008
Gender:
Country:
SAK owned:
Favorites
Season:
Episode:
Vehicle:
Jacket:
House:

|
Am I the only who really didn't care at all that Mac had a drink? It's not as if they portrayed him as alcoholic in this show, he just had a drink. I don't need him to be a perfectly squeaky-clean character.
QUOTE | Speaking of Phoenix/Phenix....... I watched an original MacGyver, it was Gold Rush. They were using Snowcats with PHENIX spelled that way.
|
It's Phoenix. They may have abbreviated it on the snowcat, but the word is definitely spelled Phoenix.
QUOTE | I thought it was cool how they named the ingredients in the MacGyvwerisms, which, to me, weren't that spectacular.
|
They weren't spectacular, but at least they were plentiful, so I give them points for that. There were probably more MacGyverisms in this one episode than there were in the entire Season 7 of the original series! (okay, I'm exaggerating, but the number of MacGyverisms did decrease drastically in the show's later years, so it was nice to see them used quite often here.)
|
|
|
Guest |
Posted: 23 September 2016 - 09:45 PM
|
Unregistered
Gender:
Country:
SAK owned:
Favorites
Season:
Episode:
Vehicle:
Jacket:
House:

|
Gonna take some time to process and adjust to this new version.
|
|
|
Guest |
Posted: 23 September 2016 - 11:18 PM
|
Unregistered
Gender:
Country:
SAK owned:
Favorites
Season:
Episode:
Vehicle:
Jacket:
House:

|
QUOTE | I always thought the proper spelling was "phoenix". |
That is the correct spelling if you are referring to the bird..... but I "SWARE" in the episode "Gold Rush" it was spelled PHENIX on the Snowcats.
|
|
|
Miasma |
Posted: 24 September 2016 - 05:29 AM
|

Phoenix Operative
     
Posts: 1,043
Joined: 8 Oct 2008
Gender:
Country:
SAK owned:
Favorites
Season:
Episode:
Vehicle:
Jacket:
House:

|
QUOTE (InVader @ 24 September 2016 - 02:37 PM) | 4. Not enough time making the MacGyverisms.
...
As for 3 and 4, I felt as if the MacGyverisms were glossed over so quickly that it doesn't give an opportunity for us to enjoy the ingenuity. Instead of spelling out what he has to work with, I would much rather prefer having Mac explain what he is doing and show us taking 20-30 seconds. I think it dampens the affect if you just show a paperclip that has already been bent and is ready to go. Let me see him actually bending it to shape. The final MacGyverism was great and it told us what he was doing, but I wanted to see more of him actually making it. |
That's actually a really valid point. While I appreciate that they're doing more MacGyverisms than the original series did in its later years, this show races through them too quickly, and doesn't allow any tension to build. In the original, there was always that bit of tension as he looked around trying to see what he could use to get out of a jam, and you could almost hear the gears in his brain turning as he tried to piece it together. And then when he did come up with a solution, it was fun for the audience to see his plan gradually come together. In this version, he knows immediately what to do, and then cobbles it together so quickly, we don't have time to appreciate it (and, to be honest, sometimes it went so quickly, I didn't even quite catch WHAT he was doing.)
I think there's a feeling among modern tv writers that everything needs to be fast paced, especially with audiences being used to watching super short videos on YouTube, etc. But the better shows know that it's fine to let a show breathe a bit, and give the audience time to absorb the moments, without constantly needing to zip along to next exciting thing.
|
|
|
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
 |
 |
Track this topic
Receive email notification when a reply has been made to this topic and you are not active on the board.
Subscribe to this forum
Receive email notification when a new topic is posted in this forum and you are not active on the board.
Download / Print this Topic
Download this topic in different formats or view a printer friendly version.
|
|
 |
|